United States v. Jose Gonzalez-Guzman

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 4 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-10573 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00069-KJD v. MEMORANDUM * JOSE GONZALEZ-GUZMAN, a.k.a. Joe Gonzalez-Guzman, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Kent J. Dawson, District Judge, Presiding Submitted September 27, 2011 ** Before: HAWKINS, SILVERMAN, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. Jose Gonzalez-Guzman appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found unlawfully in * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Gonzalez-Guzman contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because his prior conviction was stale and because the district court did not adjust his sentence downward for cultural assimilation or based on his particular history and characteristics. In light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and considering the totality of the circumstances, including the district court’s concern about the seriousness of Gonzalez-Guzman’s criminal history, the within- Guidelines sentence is not substantively unreasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007); United States v. Valencia-Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108- 09 (9th Cir. 2010). AFFIRMED. 2 10-10573