Davies v. Kalbfleisch

Per Curiam.

The exceptions were taken in general language. Counsel, if he claimed that there could be no recovery for use and occupation under the pleadings, should have specifically stated the ground of his objection. Niebuhr v. Schreyer, 135 N. Y. 614.

The judgment and order denying new trial shpuld be affirmed, with costs.

Present: Clement, Ch. J., and Van Wyck, J.

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs.