United States v. Victor Leyva-Cabrera

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 05 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-10098 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:09-cr-01162-DGC v. MEMORANDUM * VICTOR MANUEL LEYVA-CABRERA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David G. Campbell, District Judge, Presiding Submitted September 27, 2011 ** Before: HAWKINS, SILVERMAN, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. Victor Manuel Leyva-Cabrera appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for re-entry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Leyva-Cabrera contends that the district court erred by failing to consider his * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). request for a downward departure based on cultural assimilation. The record reflects that the district court considered the request but concluded that Leyva- Cabrera’s cultural ties to the United States did not justify a downward departure from the Guidelines range. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992-93 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). Leyva-Cabrera also contends that the sentence imposed was greater than necessary to accomplish the statutory purposes of sentencing. The record reflects that the court carefully considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, particularly the need to afford adequate deterrence and to protect the public, before concluding that the circumstances were insufficient to warrant a sentence below the advisory Guidelines range. Leyva-Cabrera’s sentence at the bottom of the Guidelines range is substantively reasonable under the totality of the circumstances and in light of the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). AFFIRMED. 2 10-10098