United States v. Richard Lonebear

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 05 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-30357 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 1:09-cr-00136-RFC v. MEMORANDUM * RICHARD EUGENE LONEBEAR, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Richard F. Cebull, Chief Judge, Presiding Submitted September 27, 2011 ** Before: HAWKINS, SILVERMAN, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. Richard Eugene Lonebear appeals from the lifetime term of supervised release imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for abusive sexual contact, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153(a) and 2244(a)(5). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Lonebear contends that the district court’s imposition of a lifetime term of supervised release constitutes cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment, and is substantively unreasonable. The imposition of a lifetime term of supervised release is not unconstitutionally disproportionate given the circumstances of the case. See United States v. Williams, 636 F.3d 1229, 1232- 1233 (9th Cir. 2011). The sentence is also substantively reasonable under the totality of the circumstances and in light of the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). See United States v. Daniels, 541 F.3d 915, 922-23 (9th Cir. 2008); see also U.S.S.G. § 5D1.2(b) (policy statement) (recommending the maximum term of supervised release if the offense of conviction is a sex offense). AFFIRMED. 2 10-30357