NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION,
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant,
and
EPSON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, INC. and
EPSON AMERICA, INC.,
Counterclaim Defendants,
v.
CORETRONIC CORPORATION,
Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellee,
and
OPTOMA TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
______________________
2011-1120
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of California in Case No. 06-CV-6946,
Judge Marilyn Hall Patel.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
EDWARD P. WALKER, Oliff & Berridge, PLC, of
Alexandria, Virginia, argued for plaintiff/counterclaim
defendant-appellant and counterclaim defendant appellees.
With him on the brief were JAMES A. OLIFF, JOHN W.
O’MEARA and WILLIAM J. UTERMOHLEN.
STEVEN D. HEMMINGER, Alston and Bird, LLP, of Menlo
Park, California, argued for defendant/counterclaimant-
appellee and defendant-appellee. With him on the brief
were YITAI HU and ELIZABETH H. RADER.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, BRYSON, and DYK, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
October 11, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk