[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
OCTOBER 31, 2011
No. 11-10011
JOHN LEY
Non-Argument Calendar
CLERK
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-20399-AJ-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lPlaintiff - Appellee,
versus
HAROLD OSORIO,
a.k.a. Bladimir Pizza,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(October 31, 2011)
Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Harold Osorio appeals his 51-month sentence, which he received after he
pleaded guilty to: (1) delivering a package containing a firearm to a common
carrier without written notice, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(e) and 2; (2)
knowingly possessing a firearm with an obliterated serial number, in violation of
18 U.S.C. §§ 922(k) and 2; (3) illegally concealing and exporting firearms, in
violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 554 and 2; and (4) conspiring to commit these offenses,
in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. After review, we affirm.
I.
On May 14, 2010, Osorio and Jorge Motato, Osorio’s alleged co-
conspirator, went to Cargo Zone and tried to send a package under the alias
“Bladimir Pizza” labeled “tools” to Osorio’s deceased brother in Cali, Colombia.
Agents stopped the shipment and inspected the package, which weighed 203
pounds and contained old, used tools layered over 4 Bushmaster .223 rifles, each
with its serial numbers obliterated. Agents immediately arrested Osorio at Miami
International Airport where he was preparing to board a flight to Colombia.
Agents also arrested Motato.
Between August 2008 and May 2010, Osorio bought 26 firearms, mostly
Bushmaster .223 rifles. Motato often accompanied Osorio to purchase the
2
firearms and sometimes purchased firearms himself.1 Meanwhile, Osorio and
Motato used Cargo Zone, a common carrier, to ship at least 10 packages marked
“tools” or “used tools” to Cali, Colombia. Eight of these packages weighed
between 153 and 243 pounds, and all of the packages were shipped a few days
after Osorio purchased a firearm. Osorio sent the packages under the alias
“Bladimir Pizza” or “Bladimir Osorio” and addressed the packages to a vacant
address under the name of his deceased brother. Days after he shipped each
package, Osorio traveled to Colombia.
The presentence investigation report (PSI) set Osorio’s base offense level at
26 because the probation officer concluded that Osorio’s offense involved more
than 10 non-fully automatic small firearms. U.S.S.G. § 2M5.2(a)(2). Osorio
objected, arguing that his offense involved fewer than 10 firearms and, therefore,
his base offense level should be 14 rather than 26. § 2M5.2(a)(1). At his
sentencing hearing, he argued that the government failed to prove that he shipped
any of the other firearms he bought, so § 2M5.2(a)(2) could not apply. The
district court overruled Osorio’s objection, finding that his pattern of previous
firearm purchases, shipments, and trips to Colombia matched the events that
formed the basis of his conviction. Thus, the district court found by a
1
On October 6, 2010, the government dismissed the indictment against Motato.
3
preponderance of the evidence that Osorio shipped at least 7 of the 22 additional
firearms from August 2008 to May 2010. Osorio appeals this finding.
II.
We review the district court’s factual findings for clear error. United States
v. Lopez-Garcia, 565 F.3d 1306, 1323 (11th Cir. 2009). “We cannot find clear
error ‘unless we are left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been
committed.’” United States v. Crawford, 407 F.3d 1174, 1177 (11th Cir. 2005)
(quoting Glassroth v. Moore, 335 F.3d 1282, 1292 (11th Cir. 2003)). When a
defendant challenges one of the factual bases of his sentence, the government
bears the burden of presenting reliable and specific evidence to establish the
disputed fact by a preponderance of the evidence. United States v. Martinez, 584
F.3d 1022, 1027 (11th Cir. 2009).
III.
We conclude that the district court did not clearly err by finding that Osorio
shipped more than 10 firearms to Colombia. Osorio’s conspiracy conviction is
analogous to drug-conspiracy cases in which the amount of drugs seized “does not
reflect the scale of the offense,” requiring the district court to “approximate the
quantity of the controlled substance” for sentencing purposes. United States v.
4
Frazier, 89 F.3d 1501, 1506 (11th Cir. 1996). In such cases, “a court may base its
computation on evidence showing the average frequency and amount of a
defendant’s [illegal dealings] over a given period of time.” Id. Although
sentencing in this manner cannot be based on mere speculative calculations,
sentencing “may be based on fair, accurate, and conservative estimates of the
quantity of [illegal dealings] attributable to a defendant.” United States v. Zapata,
139 F.3d 1355, 1359 (11th Cir. 1998).
The district court in this case conservatively determined based on reliable
and specific evidence in the record that Osorio previously shipped at least 10
firearms to Colombia. Osorio purchased 26 firearms and shipped packages to
Colombia days after most purchases. He shipped 10 packages in the same manner
as the package found to contain 4 of the 26 firearms. The packages were roughly
the same weight (approximately 150 to 200 pounds), were each labeled “tools” or
“used tools,” were shipped through Cargo Zone under the alias “Bladimir Pizza”
or “Bladimir Osorio,” and were sent to the address of Osorio’s deceased brother.
Osorio repeatedly traveled to Colombia after shipping a package, and he was
apprehended while attempting to do the same. This evidence shows a pattern of
behavior that, when compared to the circumstances of Osorio’s conviction,
demonstrate that he likely shipped a number of the unrecovered firearms as well.
5
Regarding the total number of firearms Osorio shipped, the district court’s
finding was not clear error. Osorio made 10 shipments in addition to the shipment
agents seized. Because the seized shipment contained 4 firearms, the district
court’s estimate that he shipped at least 7 other firearms in any combination in the
10 previous shipments was conservative.
Because the district court’s conclusion that Osorio shipped additional
firearms was based on reliable and specific evidence, and because its estimation of
the total number of firearms shipped was fair and conservative, the district court
did not commit clear error in setting Osorio’s base offense level at 26.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court and the sentence imposed.
AFFIRMED.
6