Eric Knapp v. James Tilton

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 01 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ERIC CHARLES RODNEY K’NAPP, No. 10-17725 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:08-cv-00719-JSW v. MEMORANDUM * JAMES E. TILTON; et al., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jeffrey S. White, District Judge, Presiding Submitted October 25, 2011 ** Before: TROTT, GOULD, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges. Eric Charles Rodney K’napp, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging numerous constitutional violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a district court’s dismissal for failure to * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). comply with a court order, Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 640 (9th Cir. 2002), and we affirm. The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the action for failure to comply with the court’s order after specifically warning K’napp that any amended complaint must comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20(a) concerning joinder of claims and defendants and could not “assert a grab-bag of unrelated claims against different defendants,” and cautioning K’napp that failure to comply with the court’s order would result in dismissal of the action. See id. at 640-42. AFFIRMED. 2 10-17725