United States v. Leo Gasga-Amaya

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 08 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-50531 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:10-cr-01289-LAB v. MEMORANDUM * LEO NICOLAS GASGA-AMAYA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding Submitted November 8, 2011 ** Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TASHIMA, and GRABER, Circuit Judges. Leo Nicolas Gasga-Amaya appeals from the 60-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Gasga-Amaya contends that the district court committed procedural error by imposing an upward variance largely on the basis of its perceived need for deterrence notwithstanding Gasga-Amaya’s promise not to return to the United States. The district court did not commit procedural error. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 991-92 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). Gasga-Amaya also contends that the district court committed procedural error by failing to explain adequately its rationale for imposing an upward variance under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and by failing to follow the proper procedure for imposing such a variance. The record belies these contentions. Lastly, Gasga-Amaya contends that the sentence above the advisory Sentencing Guidelines range is substantively unreasonable. The 60-month sentence was substantively reasonable in light of the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, particularly the need for the sentence imposed to reflect the need to afford adequate deterrence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). AFFIRMED. 2 10-50531