UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7070
JOHN BACCUS, a/k/a John Roosevelt Baccus,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
LEWIS A. SCOTT, Et Al,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort. David C. Norton, Chief District
Judge. (9:10-cv-02862-DCN)
Submitted: November 15, 2011 Decided: November 18, 2011
Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Roosevelt Baccus, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt,
MCDONALD, PATRICK, TINSLEY, BAGGETT & POSTON, Greenwood, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
John Roosevelt Baccus appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Baccus v. Scott, No. 9:10-cv-02862-DCN (D.S.C. July 25,
2011). We deny Baccus’s motions to compel the district court
clerk’s office to provide copies of documents, for a transcript
at Government expense, to review the record in the clerk’s
office, and to consolidate this appeal with No. 11-7101.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
John Baccus v. Lewis Scott
Combined Opinion