UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1980
PIERRE RICHARD AUGUSTIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SECTEK, INCORPORATED; SECTEK PROTECTIVE SERVICES; WILFRED D.
BLOOD; MICHELLE FOWLER; FREDERICK SPRINGFIELD; NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION OF SPECIAL POLICE AND SECURITY OFFICERS, (NASPSO);
CALEB BURRISS; JOHN DOE, Individuals yet to be determined, if
any, also involved in the making of materially false statement
and fraud as involved in this case; JANE DOE, Individuals yet to
be determined, if any, also involved in the making of materially
false statement and fraud as involved in this case,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:11-cv-00490-CMH-IDD)
Submitted: February 9, 2012 Decided: February 13, 2012
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pierre Richard Augustin, Appellant Pro Se. Steven William Ray,
ISLER, DARE, RAY, RADCLIFFE & CONNOLLY, PC, Vienna, Virginia,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Pierre Richard Augustin seeks to appeal the district
court’s order dismissing his claims against some but not all of
the defendants named in his suit. This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006),
and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order that
Augustin seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2