United States v. Alejandro Rodriguez-Maldonado

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION FEB 22 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-10082 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:10-cr-01361-DGC v. MEMORANDUM * ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ- MALDONADO, a.k.a. Alejandro R. Maldonado, a.k.a. Alexandro R. Maldonado, a.k.a. Felipe Olivera Mejia, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David G. Campbell, District Judge, Presiding Submitted February 21, 2012 ** Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges. Alejandro Rodriguez-Maldonado appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 21-month sentence for re-entry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Rodriguez- Maldonado’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. We dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000). Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. DISMISSED. 2 11-10082