FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 05 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-50212
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:10-cr-04623-LAB
v.
MEMORANDUM *
RICARDO ROBLEDO CASTANEDA,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of California
Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 21, 2012 **
Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Ricardo Robledo Castaneda appeals from the 120-month sentence imposed
following a guilty-plea conviction for importation of methamphetamine, in
violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 960, and 963. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
§ 1291, and we affirm.
Castaneda contends that the district court erred by finding him ineligible for
safety valve relief pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f). The district court’s factual
determination that Castaneda failed to provide truthful and complete information to
the government was not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Mejia-Pimental,
477 F.3d 1100, 1105-06 (9th Cir. 2007). Further, the district court did not abuse its
discretion by denying his request for an evidentiary hearing on this issue. See
United States v. Real-Hernandez, 90 F.3d 356, 362 (9th Cir. 1996).
Castaneda also contends that the district court erred by declining to award a
minor role adjustment because he was substantially less culpable than the average
co-participant. The district court did not clearly err by declining to award the
adjustment. See United States v. Cantrell, 433 F.3d 1269, 1283-84 (9th Cir. 2006).
In any case, as the district court noted, this issue is moot in light of the
determination under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f).
AFFIRMED.
2 11-50212