Grimmer v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Per Curiam,

A careful examination of the testimony, in the light of the clear and able argument of appellant’s counsel, has failed to disclose anything that would have justified the learned trial judge in submitting to the jury the question of defendant company’s negligence as the proximate cause of plaintiff’s unfortunate injury. We are all of opinion that there was no error in refusing to take off the judgment of nonsuit.

Judgment affirmed.