NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
Wntttb ~tates ([ourt of §ppeaIs
for tbe jfeberaI ([treutt
TECHNOLOGY PATENTS LLC,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
T-MOBILE (UK) LTD., T-MOBILE AUSTRIA GMBH,
T-MOBILE CZECH REPUBLIC A.S., T-MOBILE
DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, T-MOBILE HUNGARY CO.
LTD., T-MOBILE NETHERLANDS B.V., AND T-
MOBILE SLOVENSKO A.S.,
Defendants-Appellees,
AND
ADVANCED INFO SERVICE PLC, ALSO KNOWN
AS AlS, BELL MOBILITY INC., CSL NEW WORLD
MOBILITY LIMITED, CHINA MOBILE PEOPLES
TELEPHONE COMPANY LIMITED, NOW KNOWN
AS CHINA MOBILE HONG KONG COMPANY
LIMITED, KT FREETEL CO. LTD., NOW KNOWN
AS KT CORPORATION, SINGAPORE TELECOM
MOBILE PRIVATE LIMITED, SINGAPORE
TELECOMMUNICATIONS LIMITED, ALSO KNOWN
AS SINGTEL, SINGTEL OPTUS PTY LIMITED,
STARHUB MOBILE PTE LTD., AND TELSTRA
CORPORATION LIMITED,
Defendants-Appellees,
AND
TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBILE 2
AMERICA MOVIL, SAR DE C.V., CLARO, SA,
AMX ARGENTINA, S.A., AND RADIOMOVIL DIPSA,
S.A. DE C.V., ALSO KNOWN AS TELCEL,
Defendants-Appellees,
AND
BELGACOM MOBILE S.A., ALSO KNOWN AS
PROXIMUS, MOBILKOM AUSTRIA AG, SFR, ALSO
KNOWN AS SOCIETE FRANCAISE DE
RADIOTELEPHONE SA, SMARTONE MOBILE
COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED, TANGO SA,
VODAFONE CZECH REPUBLIC A.S., VODAFONE
D2 GMBH, ALSO KNOWN AS VODAFONE
GERMANY, VODAFONE ESPANA S.A., VODAFONE
ESSAR LTD., VODAFONE HUNGARY MOBILE
TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD., VODAFONE
IRELAND LTD., VODAFONE LIBERTEL B.V.,
VODAFONE LIMITED, ALSO KNOWN AS
VODAFONE UK, VODAFONE NETWORK PTY.
LTD., VODAFONE NEW ZEALAND, VODAFONE
OMNITEL N.V., VODAFONE PORTUGAL,
COMUNICACOES PESSOAIS, SA, VODAFONE
TELEKOMUNIKASYON A.S., ALSO KNOWN AS
VODAFONE TURKEY, AND VODAFONE-PANAFON
HELLENIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
SA, ALSO KNOWN AS VODAFONE-PANAFON S.A.,
Defendants-Appellees,
AND
TNL PCS S.A., ALSO KNOWN AS 01,
Defendant-Appellee,
AND
BASE N.V.lS.A., E-PLUS MOBILFUNK GMBH & CO.
KG, AND KPN B.V.,
Defendants-Appellees,
AND
3 TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBILE
BERMUDA DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS LTD_,
Defendant-Appellee,
AND
BOUYGUES TELECOM S.A.,
Defendant-Appellee,
AND
CHUNGHWA TELECOM CO. LTD.,
FAR EASTONE TELCOMMUNICATIONS CO. LTD.,
AND TAIWAN MOBILE CO., LTD.,
Defendants-Appellees,
AND
CLICKATELL (PTY) LTD.,
Defendant-Appellee,
AND
FRANCE TELECOM ESPANA S.A., ALSO·KNOWN
AS ORANGE SPAIN, FRANCE TELECOM S.A.,
MOBISTAR N.V.• ORANGE AUSTRIA
TELECOMMUNICATION GMBH, FORMERLY
KNOWN AS ONE GMBH, ORANGE
COMMUNICATIONS S.A., ALSO KNOWN AS
ORANGE SWITZERLAND, ORANGE FRANCE S.A.,
ORANGE PLC, ALSO KNOWN AS ORANGE U.K..
ORANGE S.A., ORANGE SLOVENSKO A.S., AND
VOX MOBILE S.A.,
Defendants-Appellees,
AND
H3G S.P.A., ALSO KNOWN AS 3 ITALIA,
HUTCHISON 3G AUSTRIA GMBH, HUTCHISON 3G
UK LIMITED, AND HUTCHISON
TELECOMMUNICATIONS (HONG KONG)
LIMITED,
Defendants-Appellees,
TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBlLE 4
AND
KDDI CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellee,
AND
PCCW MOBILE HK LIMITED,
Defendant-Appellee,
AND
YAHOO! INC.,
Defendant-Appellee,
AND
KABUSHIKI KAISHA NTT DOCOMO AND
SOFTBANK MOBILE CORP.,
Defendants-Appellees,
AND
M3 WIRELESS LTD.,
Defendant-Appellee,
AND
NETCOM AS, NOW KNOWN AS TELIASONERA
NORGE AS AND TELIA DANMARK AlS,
Defendants-Appellees,
AND
TMN-TELECOMUNICACOES MOVEIS NACIONAIS,
S.A.,
Defendant-Appellee,
AND
02 (GERMANY) GMBH & CO. OHG, 02 (UK)
LIMITED, 02 COMMUNICATIONS (IRELAND)
LTD., PEGASO PCS, S.A. DE C.V., TELEFONICA
MOVILES ARGENTINA, S.A., TELEFONICA
MOVILES ESPANA, S.A.U., TELEFONICA MOVILES
MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V., TELEFONICA 02 CZECH
5 TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBILE
REPUBLIC, A.S., TELEFONICA 02 EUROPE PLC,
ALSO KNOWN AS 02 PLC, TELEFONICA, S.A.,
VIVO PARTICIPACOES, S.A., AND VIVO, S.A.,
Defendants-Appellees,
AND
PANNON GSM TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD.,
SONOFON AlS, SWISSCOM MOBILE A.G., TDC AlS,
TDC SWITZERLAND AG, ALSO KNOWN AS
SUNRISE, TELENOR MOBIL A.S., AND TOTAL
ACCESS COMMUNICATION PLC, ALSO KNOWN
ASDTAC,
Defendants-Appellees,
AND
SONAECOM-SERVICOS DE COMUNICACOES, S.A.,
Defendant-Appellee,
AND
TELECOM ITALIA S.PA., TELECOM PERSONAL
S.A., TIM CELULAR S.A., AND TIM
PARTICIPACOES S.A., ALSO KNOWN AS TIM
BRAZIL,
Defendants-Appellees,
AND
TRUE MOVE COMPANY LIMITED,
Defendant-Appellee,
AND
WIND HELLAS TELECOMMUNICATIONS S.A. AND
WIND TELECOMUNICAZIONI SPA,
Defendants-Appellees,
AND
AVEA ILETISIM HIZMETLERI A.S.,
Defendant-Appellee,
AND
TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBILE 6
T-MOBILE USA, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee,
AND
AT&T MOBILITY LLC,
Defendant-Appellee,
AND
TELE-MOBILE COMPANY, ALSO KNOWN AS
TELUS MOBILITY,
Defendant-Appellee,
AND
ROGERS WIRELESS PARTNERSHIP,
Defendant-Appellee,
AND
MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellee,
AND
PALM, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee,
AND
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, DOING BUSINESS AS
VERIZON WIRELESS,
Defendant-Appellee,
AND
HELlO, LLC AND SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION,
Defendants-Appellees,
AND
LG ELECTRONICS MOBILECOMM U.S.A., INC.,
Defendant-Appellee,
AND
7 TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBILE
MOTOROLA, INC., NOW KNOWN AS MOTOROLA
SOLUTIONS, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee,
AND
IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED,
Defendant-Appellee,
AND
DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG, MOBILE ONE LTD.,
ORANGE LIMITED, ORANGE NEDERLAND N.V.,
TURK CELL ILETISIM HIZMETLERI A.S., AND
UPSIDE WIRELESS INC., ALSO KNOWN AS IPIPI,
Defendants,
AND
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.,
Intervenor.
2011-1581
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of Maryland in case no. 07-CV-3012, Judge Alex-
ander Williams, Jr.
TECHNOLOGY PATENTS LLC,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
T-MOBILE (UK) LTD., T-MOBILE AUSTRIA GMBH,
T-MOBILE CZECH REPUBLIC A.S., T-MOBILE
DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, T-MOBILE HUNGARY CO.
LTD., T-MOBILE NETHERLANDS B.V., AND T-
MOBILE SLOVENSKO A.S.,
Defendants,
TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBILE 8
AND
ADVANCED INFO SERVICE PLC, ALSO KNOWN
AS AIS, BELL MOBILITY INC., CSL NEW WORLD
MOBILITY LIMITED, CHINA MOBILE PEOPLES
TELEPHONE COMPANY LIMITED, NOW KNOWN
AS CHINA MOBILE HONG KONG COMPANY
LIMITED, KT FREETEL CO. LTD., NOW KNOWN
AS KT CORPORATION, SINGAPORE TELECOM
MOBILE PRIVATE LIMITED, SINGAPORE
TELECOMMUNICATIONS LIMITED, ALSO KNOWN
AS SINGTEL, SINGTEL OPTUS PTY LIMITED,
STARHUB MOBILE PTE LTD., AND TELSTRA
CORPORATION LIMITED,
Defendants,
AND
AMERICA MOVIL, S.A.B. DE C.V., CLARO, S.A.,
AMX ARGENTINA, S.A., AND RADIOMOVIL DIPSA,
S.A. DE C.V., ALSO KNOWN AS TELCEL,
Defendants,
AND
BELGACOM MOBILE S.A., ALSO KNOWN AS
PROXIMUS, MOBILKOM AUSTRIA AG, SFR, ALSO
KNOWN AS SOCIETE FRANCAISE DE
RADIOTELEPHONE S.A., SMARTONE MOBILE
COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED, TANGO S.A.,
VODAFONE CZECH REPUBLIC A.S., VODAFONE
D2 GMBH, ALSO KNOWN AS VODAFONE
GERMANY, VODAFONE ESPANA S.A., VODAFONE
ESSAR LTD., VODAFONE HUNGARY MOBILE
TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD., VODAFONE
IRELAND LTD., VODAFONE LIBERTEL B.V.,
VODAFONE LIMITED, ALSO KNOWN AS
VODAFONE UK, VODAFONE NETWORK PTY.
LTD., VODAFONE NEW ZEALAND, VODAFONE
OMNITEL N.V., VODAFONE PORTUGAL,
9 TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBILE
COMUNICACOES PESSOAIS, S.A., VODAFONE
TELEKOMUNIKASYON A.S., ALSO KNOWN AS
VODAFONE TURKEY, AND VODAFONE-PANAFON
HELLENIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
S.A., ALSO KNOWN AS VODAFONE-PANAFON S.A.,
Defendants,
AND
TNL PCS S.A., ALSO KNOWN AS 01,
Defendant,
AND
BASE N.V.lS.A., E-PLUS MOBILFUNK GMBH & CO.
KG, AND KPN B.V.,
Defendants,
AND
BERMUDA DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS LTD.,
Defendant,
AND
BOUYGUES TELECOM S.A.,
Defendant,
AND
CHUNGHWATELECOM CO. LTD.,
FAR EASTONE TELCOMMUNICATIONS CO. LTD.,
AND TAIWAN MOBILE CO., LTD.,
Defendants,
AND
CLICKATELL (PTY) LTD.,
Defendant,
AND
FRANCE TELECOM ESPANA S.A., ALSO KNOWN
AS ORANGE SPAIN, FRANCE TELECOM S.A.,
MOBISTAR N.V., ORANGE AUSTRIA
TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBILE 10
TELECOMMUNICATION GMBH, FORMERLY
KNOWN AS ONE GMBH, ORANGE
COMMUNICATIONS S.A., ALSO KNOWN AS
ORANGE SWITZERLAND, ORANGE FRANCE S.A.,
ORANGE PLC, ALSO KNOWN AS ORANGE U.K.,
ORANGE S.A., ORANGE SLOVENSKO A.S., AND
VOX MOBILE S.A.,
Defendants,
AND
H3G S.P.A., ALSO KNOWN AS 3ITALIA,
HUTCHISON 3G AUSTRIA GMBH, HUTCHISON 3G
UK LIMITED, AND HUTCHISON
TELECOMMUNICATIONS (HONG KONG)
LIMITED,
Defendants,
AND
KDDI CORPORATION,
Defendant,
AND
PCCW MOBILE HK LIMITED,
Defendant,
AND
YAHOO! INC.,
Defendant,
AND
KABUSHIKI KAISHA NTT DOCOMO AND
SOFTBANK MOBILE CORP.,
Defendants,
AND
M3 WIRELESS LTD.,
Defendant,
11 TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBlLE
AND
NETCOM AS, NOW KNOWN AS TELIASONERA
NORGE AS AND TELIA DANMARK AlS,
Defendants,
AND
TMN-TELECOMUNICACOES MOVEIS NACIONAIS,
S.A.,
Defendant,
AND
02 (GERMANY) GMBH & CO. OHG, 02 (UK)
LIMITED, 02 COMMUNICATIONS (IRELAND)
LTD., PEGASO PCS, S.A. DE C.V., TELEFONICA
MOVILES ARGENTINA, S.A., TELEFONICA
MOVILES ESPANA, S.A.U., TELEFONICA MOVILES
MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V., TELEFONICA 02 CZECH
REPUBLIC, A.S., TELEFONICA 02 EURQPE PLC,
ALSO KNOWN AS 02 PLC, TELEFONICA, S.A.,
VIVO PARTICIPACOES, S.A., AND VIVO, S.A.,
Defendants,
AND
PANNON GSM TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD.,
SONOFON AlS, SWISSCOM MOBILE A.G., TDC AlS,
TDC SWITZERLAND AG, ALSO KNOWN AS
SUNRISE, TELENOR MOBIL A.S., AND TOTAL
ACCESS COMMUNICATION PLC, ALSO KNOWN
ASDTAC,
Defendants,
AND
SONAECOM-SERVICOS DE COMUNICACOES, S.A.,
Defendant,
AND
TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBlLE 12
TELECOM ITALIA S.PA., TELECOM PERSONAL
S.A., TIM CELULAR S.A., AND TIM
PARTICIPACOES S.A., ALSO KNOWN AS TIM
BRAZIL,
Defendants,
AND
TRUE MOVE COMPANY LIMITED,
Defendant,
AND
WIND HELLAS TELECOMMUNICATIONS S.A. AND
WIND TELECOMUNICAZIONI SPA,
Defendants,
AND
AVEA ILETISIM HIZMETLERI A.S.,
Defendant,
AND
T-MOBILE USA, INC.,
Defendant-Appellant,
AND
AT&T MOBILITY LLC,
Defendant-Appellant,
AND
TELE-MOBILE COMPANY, ALSO KNOWN AS
TELUS MOBILITY,
Defendant,
AND
ROGERS WIRELESS PARTNERSHIP,
Defendant,
AND
MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellant,
13 TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBILE
AND
PALM,INC.,
Defendant-Appellant,
AND
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, DOING BUSINESS AS
VERIZON WIRELESS,
Defendant-Appellant,
AND
HELlO, LLC AND SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION,
Defendants-Appellants,
AND
LG ELECTRONICS MOBILECOMM U.S.A., INC.,
Defendant-Appellant,
AND
MOTOROLA, INC., NOW KNOWN AS MOtOROLA
SOLUTIONS, INC.,
Defendant-Appellant,
AND
IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED,
Defendant,
AND
DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG, MOBILEONE LTD.,
ORANGE LIMITED, ORANGE NEDERLAND N.V.,
TURK CELL ILETISIM HIZMETLERI A.S., AND
UPSIDE WIRELESS INC., ALSO KNOWN AS IPIPI,
Defendants,
AND
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.,
Intervenor.
TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBILE 14
2011-1612, -1613
Appeals from the United States District Court for the
District of Maryland in case no. 07-CV-3012, Judge Alex-
ander Williams, Jr.
ON MOTION
ORDER
The Defendants-Cross Appellants move to voluntarily
dismiss Cross-Appeal Nos. 2011-1612 and 2011-1613 and
to conform the briefing schedule to the dismissal of the
cross appeals.
Upon consideration thereof,
IT Is ORDERED THAT:
(1) The motion to dismiss cross appeal nos. 2011-1612
and 2011-1613 is granted. 2011-1612 and 2011-1613 are
dismissed. The revised official caption for 2011-1581 is
reflected above.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs in 2011-1612
and 2011-1613.
(3) The motion to conform the briefing schedule is
granted to the extent that the appellees' principal briefs
are due on February 24, 2012 and the appellant's reply
brief is due on March 30,2012.
FOR THE COURT
JAN 202012 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk
FILED
u.s. COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
JAN 202012
JAN HORBAlY
CLERK
15 TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBILE
cc: Bryant C. Boren, Jr., Esq.
Doris Johnson Hines, Esq.
Sharon A. Israel, Esq.
Matthew J. Moore, Esq.
Ian N. Feinberg, Esq.
Roderick R. McKelvie, Esq.
Louis M. Solomon, Esq.
Kevin P. Anderson, Esq.
Brian Wm. Higgins, Esq.
Stefani E. Shanberg, Esq.
Stuart J. Sinder, Esq.
James W. Dabney, Esq.
Stephen B. Kinnaird, Esq.
Brian M. Koide, Esq.
William H. Burgess, Esq.
Deanne E. Maynard, Esq.
Michael J. McKeon, Esq.
Robert C. Bertin, Esq.
George F. Pappas, Esq.
Jonathan E. Retsky, Esq.
Stephen S. Madsen, Esq.
Kevin Walsh, Esq.
Russell E. Levine, Esq.
Michael M. Markman, Esq.
Robert C. Nissen, Esq.
Edward Han, Esq.
Brian C. Riopelle, Esq.
Ramsey M. AI-Salam, Esq.
Abbe F. Fletman, Esq.
David L. Leichtman, Esq.
Andrew R. Sommer, Esq.
Joseph A. Rhoa, Esq.
Maximilian A. Grant, Esq.
Jay F. Utley, Esq.
Adam Gahtan, Esq.
Adam R. Alper, Esq.
Scott R. Matthews, Esq.
TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBILE 16
Steven Jay Young, Esq.
Victor Siber, Esq.
s21
Issued As A Mandate (as to 2011-1612, -1613 only): JAN 20 2012