Rcn Television, S.A. v. Rcn Telecom Services, Inc.

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit RCN TELEVISION, S.A., Appellant, V. RCN TELECOM SERVICES, INC., Appellee. 2011-1112 (Car1ce11ati0n N0s. 92051509 and 92052167) Appea1 from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Tria1 and Appea1 B0ard. ON MOTION Be-fore RADER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and BRYSON, Circuit Judges. BRYSON, Circuit Judge. 0 R D E R RCN Te1ec0m Services, LLC (RCN Te1ec0m) moves to dismiss RCN Te1evisi0n, S.A. (RCN Televisi0n)’s appeal from the Traden1ark Tria1 and Appea1 B0ard (TTAB) as RCN TELEVISION V. RCN TELECOM 2 premature and moves for sanctions. RCN Television moves for an extension of time to file its opposition, and opposes. RCN Telec0In replies. RCN Television appeals the TTAB’s August 26, 2010 decision that, inter alia, dismissed claims to cancel eighteen registered trademarks of RCN Telecom due to allegations of fraud. The Board has not disposed of the portion of RCN Television’s petition for cancellation that asserts fifteen of those trademarks should be canceled pursuant to Section 2(d) of the Lanham Act. ` RCN Telecom contends that the August 26, 2010 decision is not a final, appealable decision pursuant to this court’s decision in C'opelands’ E'nter., Inc. u. CNV, Inc., 887 F.2d 1065 (Fed. Cir. 1989) (en banc). We agree. In C'opelcmds, this court held that it would review decisions of the TTAB only if the decision "put an end to the litigation before the Board.” 887 F.2d at 1068. Thus, a party dissatisfied with a TTAB determination`“must await and raise all claims of error in a single appeal." Id. Because RCN Television prematurely seeks to appeal from a TTAB decision that does not put an end to the litigation before the Board, we grant RCN Telecom’s motion. RCN Telecom may appeal these issues after the Board rules on all claims Aocordingly, IT ls OR:oERED THAT: (1) RCN Television’s motion for an extension of time is granted (2) RCN Telecom’s motion to dismiss is granted. (3) RCN Telecom’s motion for sanctions is denied 3 RCN TELEVISION V. RCN TELECOM (4) Each side shall bear its own costs. FoR THE CoURT 0 6 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date J an Horba1y Clerk cc: Gary H. Fechter, Esq. S Kevin l\/lark Flannery, Esq. FlLED s.s. com F ii ms FEo1fRnlPcilF2Aci1eif0 AFR-05 2011 .IA||'H0|DN.¥ ' Cl.Ell(