For the reason that the city of Pittston continued to use the water of the appellee after notice that it would have to pay for the same, the judgment against it for what the referee found the water was reasonably worth is affirmed.
For the reason that the city of Pittston continued to use the water of the appellee after notice that it would have to pay for the same, the judgment against it for what the referee found the water was reasonably worth is affirmed.