There was. sufficient evidence to warrant the learned chancellor in finding, as he did, “that there was no actual delivery of the deeds in question by the grantor to the grantees named therein in the lifetime of the grantor, but they were retained in the possession and under the control of the grantor.” This was the controlling question in the case, and, having been found in favor of the plaintiffs, a decree was properly entered against the defendants.
Decree affirmed.