May's Estate

Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date filed: 1917-06-30
Citations: 259 Pa. 115, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 527, 102 A. 422
Copy Citations
1 Citing Case
Lead Opinion
Per Curiam,

The provision in the will of the testatrix for Mary E. McManemy, now Mary E. Mulliken, was for income only, and, with the codicil’s revocation of that provision* there was, as the court below correctly held, an intestacy as to such income, without affecting the testamentary disposition of the corpus or principal from which it accrued : Reiehard’s App., 116 Pa. 232.

Appeal dismissed at appellants’ costs.