UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1789
YISSA OUOLOGUEM,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: March 6, 2012 Decided: March 20, 2012
Before DIAZ and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per
curiam opinion.
Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington,
Virginia, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney
General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Senior Litigation Counsel,
Lori B. Warlick, Trial Attorney, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, D.C., for
Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Yissa Ouologuem petitions for review of an order of
the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying her motion to
reconsider. We have reviewed the administrative record and the
Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its
discretion in denying the motion to reconsider. See 8 C.F.R.
§ 1003.2(a) (2011); Narine v. Holder, 559 F.3d 246, 249 (4th
Cir. 2009) (setting forth standard of review). We therefore
deny the petition for review in part for the reasons stated by
the Board. See In re: Ouologuem (B.I.A. June 24, 2011). We
lack jurisdiction to review the Board’s refusal to exercise its
sua sponte authority to reopen and therefore dismiss this
portion of the petition for review. See Mosere v. Mukasey, 552
F.3d 397, 400-01 (4th Cir. 2009).
Accordingly, we deny in part and dismiss in part the
petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED IN PART
AND DISMISSED IN PART
2