United States v. Jarvis Anderson

[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MARCH 23, 2012 No. 11-11985 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY CLERK ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-00271-CG-N-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll l Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JARVIS ANDERSON, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama ________________________ (March 23, 2012) Before BARKETT, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: J. Clark Stankoski, appointed counsel for Jarvis Anderson in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Anderson’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. 2