dissents for the reasons most recently noted in Smelts v. Copeland, 440 Pa. 224, 226, 269 A. 2d 466, 468 (1970) (dissenting opinion) and once again urges that the unwise and unjust doctrine of governmental immunity be abolished.
Mr. Justice Pomeroydissents for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in Laughner v. Allegheny County, 436 Pa. 572, 576, 261 A. 2d 607 (1970).