United States v. Rodriguez-Rodriguez

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 19, 2008 No. 07-40601 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. BENJAMIN RODRIGUEZ-RODRIGUEZ Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:06-CR-1139-1 Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Benjamin Rodriguez-Rodriguez (Rodriguez) appeals his conviction and sentence for illegal reentry. He argues that the district court erred in enhancing his sentence pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(i) based on a finding that his Texas conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver was a “drug trafficking offense.” Rodriguez correctly concedes that his * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 07-40601 Guidelines argument is foreclosed by United States v. Ford, 509 F.3d 714, 717 (5th Cir. 2007), and he raises it solely to preserve its further review. In light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), Rodriguez also challenges the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than elements of the offense that must be found by a jury. This argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 872 (2008). AFFIRMED. 2