UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6304
ROBERT LEE WALSH,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DISTRICT COURT, Clerk of
Charleston Division; MILDRED L. RIVERA, Warden FCI Estill,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Richard M. Gergel, District Judge.
(8:10-cv-00085-RMG)
Submitted: April 6, 2012 Decided: April 13, 2012
Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Lee Walsh, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Robert Lee Walsh, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and dismissing Walsh’s 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West
2006 & Supp. 2011) petition. Walsh has also filed a motion to
supplement his informal brief. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant in part and
deny in part his motion to supplement his informal brief and
affirm the district court’s judgment. * Walsh v. United States,
No. 8:10-cv-00085-RMG (D.S.C. Oct. 28, 2010). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
Absent exceptional circumstances, this court generally
does not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal.
Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993).
2