Commonwealth v. Scott

Opinion

per Curiam,

Appellant’s sole claim is that his waiver of a jury trial was inadequate under the standards set forth in Commonwealth v. Williams, 454 Pa. 368, 312 A.2d 597 (1973). This issue not having been raised in post-trial motions, it cannot be raised on this direct appeal. Commonwealth v. Agie, 449 Pa. 187, 296 A.2d 741 (1972).

Judgment affirmed.