Order affirmed.
HOFFMAN, J., dissented on the ground that Pa.R.C.P. 2252 permits joinder under these facts. WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this cáse.Order affirmed.
HOFFMAN, J., dissented on the ground that Pa.R.C.P. 2252 permits joinder under these facts. WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this cáse.