Johnson v. Ensign

Per Curiam:

There is no error in refusing to affirm the points submitted’ by the plaintiffs. We fully concur with the learned judge that,, so far as third persons were concerned, the plaintiffs were-lenders of the money and not purchasers of the property. Itr *515follows that they cannot hold the property as security for their advances, against creditors who have taken it in execution.

Judgment affirmed.