Johnson v. Ensign

Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date filed: 1886-05-17
Citations: 2 Sadler 510
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Lead Opinion
Per Curiam:

There is no error in refusing to affirm the points submitted’ by the plaintiffs. We fully concur with the learned judge that,, so far as third persons were concerned, the plaintiffs were-lenders of the money and not purchasers of the property. Itr

Page 515
follows that they cannot hold the property as security for their advances, against creditors who have taken it in execution.

Judgment affirmed.