Potteiger v. Potteiger

Per Curiam :

- All the alleged errors are to the charge of the court. It is claimed that the language covered by the third specification is incorrect. It follows, however, a pretty full statement of the evidence, so that it is substantially correct. We see nothing in the general language of the charge to make it misleading. There is nothing therein which gives a just cause for reversing the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.