McAlarney v. Conyngham

Pee Curiam:

An examination of the evidence, and a due consideration of the argument of the counsel for the plaintiffs in error, fail to satisfy us that the learned judge committed any error.

We concur with him in declaring that all the evidence is not sufficient to impeach the validity, or to change or alter the legal effect, of the mortgage and the supplementary agreement which became a part thereof. There is no error in the answers to the points under the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.