This case, like Rhine’s Appeal, just decided, [the preceding case] was an attempt to get a judgment opened upon the ground of fraud in the procuring of said judgment, and upon the unsupported oath of the petitioner, flatly contradicted in all its material averments. The action of the court below was clearly right, and the discussion of the assignments of error would be a mere waste of time.
Decree affirmed, and the appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellants. h. j. l.