UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1925
In re: DARYL ANTHONY GREEN,
Debtor.
------------------------------------------
DARYL ANTHONY GREEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT
ENFORCEMENT,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 21-1927
In re: DARYL ANTHONY GREEN,
Debtor.
-------------------------------------------
DARYL ATHONY GREEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT
ENFORCEMENT; PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
TIMOTHY BRANIGAN,
Trustee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:20-cv-02871-TDC; 8:20-cv-03183-TDC)
Submitted: February 24, 2022 Decided: February 28, 2022
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daryl Anthony Green, Appellant Pro Se. Karen Hess Rohrbaugh, Assistant Attorney
General, Mary Colleen Murphy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Daryl Anthony Green appeals from the district court’s
order dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his separate appeals from the bankruptcy court’s
orders: (1) granting his motion for a continuance, deferring action on his motion for
judicial notice, and denying his motions to compel discovery and for sanctions, for entry
of a default, and to reinstate his driver’s license and passport (No. 21-1925); and (2)
dismissing his adversary proceeding without prejudice for failure to timely effectuate
service of process (No. 21-1927). We have reviewed the records and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Green v. Prince
George’s Cnty. Ofc. of Child Support Enf’t, Nos. 8:20-cv-02871-TDC, 8:20-cv-03183-
TDC (D. Md. Aug. 10, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3