State v. Mitchell

[Cite as State v. Mitchell, 2022-Ohio-1063.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 110582 v. : ANTWUAN MITCHELL, : Defendant-Appellant. : JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION JUDGMENT: AFFIRMED RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: March 31, 2022 Criminal Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CR-20-647744-A Appearances: Michael C. O’Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Morgan Austin, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Richard A. Neff, for appellee. LISA B. FORBES, J.: I. Facts and Procedural History On May 10, 2021, Antwuan Mitchell (“Mitchell”) pled guilty to robbery, a second-degree felony, in violation of R.C. 2911.02(A)(1) with a firearm specification and abduction, a third-degree felony, in violation of R.C. 2905.02(A)(2). On May 26, 2021, the court sentenced Mitchell to a minimum of fours years and a maximum of six years in prison for the robbery under the Reagan Tokes Law, to run consecutive to one year in prison for the firearm specification. The court also sentenced Mitchell to three years in prison for the abduction and ordered that this sentence run consecutive to the sentence for the robbery. It is from this sentence that Mitchell appeals raising the following sole assignment of error: “As amended by the Reagan Tokes [Law], the revised code’s sentences for first- and second-degree qualifying felonies violates [sic] the constitutions of the United States and the state of Ohio; the trial court plainly erred in imposing a Reagan Tokes indefinite sentence.” II. Law and Analysis Mitchell’s assignment of error is overruled pursuant to this court’s en banc decision in State v. Delvallie, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109315, 2022-Ohio-470. Judgment affirmed. It is ordered that appellee recover from appellant costs herein taxed. The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal. It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the common pleas court to carry this judgment into execution. A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. LISA B. FORBES, JUDGE FRANK DANIEL CELEBREZZE, III, P.J., and MARY J. BOYLE, J., CONCUR N.B. The author of this opinion is constrained to apply Delvallie. For a full explanation, see State v. Delvallie, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109315, 2022-Ohio-470 (Forbes, J., dissenting).