Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed May 4, 2022.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D21-1765
Lower Tribunal Nos. F85-32540, 09-50922, F85-32539, F85-32541, F08-
34057, F86-4671
________________
Juan Francisco Vega,
Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida,
Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marlene
Fernandez-Karavetsos, Judge.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and James Odell and Andrew
Stanton, Assistant Public Defenders, for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney
General, for appellee.
Before SCALES, MILLER, and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Barron v. State, 217 So. 3d 1088, 1091 (Fla. 3d DCA
2017) (allowing trial court to weigh and consider competing expert
testimony to determine if the probable cause threshold is met); see also
Vega v. Dep't of Child. and Fams., 215 So. 3d 193, 194 (Fla. 3d DCA
2017) (“The trial court properly found the statute at issue to be
constitutional.”); see also Anderson v. State, 93 So. 3d 1201, 1209 (Fla. 1st
DCA 2012) (Padovano, J., concurring) (“It is doubtful that the statute of
limitations can be applied at all in a Jimmy Ryce Act proceeding, as there is
no point at which the action can be said to have accrued.”).
2