Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed May 25, 2022.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D21-1756
Lower Tribunal No. 19-5959
________________
5725 Lagorce Partners, LLC,
Appellant,
vs.
5AIF Maple 2 LLC,
Appellee.
An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade
County, Migna Sanchez-Llorens, Judge.
Marrero, Chamizo, Marcer Law, LP, and Julio C. Marrero, for
appellant.
John L. Penson, P.A., and John L. Penson, for appellee.
Before EMAS, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Tanis v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., 289 So. 3d 517, 522
(Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (“‘[I]t is essential that no sale be set aside for trifling
reasons, or on account of matters which ought to have been attended to by
the complaining party prior thereto,’ as appellants were apprised of the
pendency of the action, thus afforded an opportunity to object, we ascertain
no abuse of discretion in the ruling of the trial court”) (quoting Pewabic Mining
Co. v. Mason, 145 U.S. 349, 356 (1892)). See also Volynsky v. Park Tree
Invs. 21, LLC, 322 So. 3d 714, 716 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021) (“[T]he trial court
afforded Volynsky both notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard,
satisfying the essential elements of due process”) (citing § 45.031(8), Fla.
Stat. (2021)).
2