51st judicial district, specially presiding, — The reasons urged in support of this motion for a new trial are:
1. That the court erred in submitting as a measure of damages for the injuries to the plaintiff’s automobile the amount that was expended for the purpose of repairing the same, contending that the proper measure of damages would be the difference between the market value of the automobile before and after the accident.
In support of this reason, the defendant has cited to the court a number of cases decided by the Superior Court, but on reference to all of them, we find that the measure of damages contended for on the part of the defendant was used in these cases either as a measure of damages additional to the costs of repair of the machine or was used in cases where the machine was not capable of being repaired. We are clearly of the opinion that no error as to the measure of damages was made by the court at the time of the trial.
In view of the above conclusions, the motion for a new trial is dismissed and the judgment on the verdict is directed to be entered upon the payment of the jury fee.