In this case the two notes form together one usurious contract. The statute avoids them both.
Judgment on the verdict. (2), (a)
Vide Cro. Jac. 508, Roberts vs. Trenayne.
Maine Bank vs. Butts, 9 Mass. Rep. 49. — Bridge & Al. vs. Hubbard, 15 Mass Rep. 96.— Wickes vs. Gogerly, 2 Car. & P. 397, 1 R. & M. 123. —Preston vs. Jackson 2 Stark. 237.—Pickering vs. Banks, Forrest, 72.