This is an action of tort to recover compensation for injuries received by the plaintiff by reason of an alleged defect in a highway. The place where the injury occurred as shown by the evidence was not on a sidewalk but on the part of the way designed for vehicular traffic ádjacent to a rail of street railway tracks. There is no evidence of a breach of the statutory duty of the defendant. The plaintiff’s evidence as to the alleged defect was that “she slipped on a patch of ice formed from water which had filled a saucer-shaped depression in the surface of the street.” Another witness described the place as a “hole in. the pavement.” There is nothing to indicate the size of the alleged “depression” or “hole.” The photographs of the plaintiff indicate a slight depression not amounting to a defect in the street. On the authority of Raymond v. Lowell, 6 Cush. 524, Newton v. Worcester, 174 Mass. 181, and Cannon v. Brookline, 256 Mass. 468, the plaintiff cannot recover. In view of the ground on which this decision rests, the other points argued need not be considered.
Exceptions overruled.