IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA
2022-NCCOA-458
No. COA21-503
Filed 5 July 2022
Pender County, No. 20 CVS 752
LT. COL. DONALD SULLIVAN, Plaintiff,
v.
PENDER COUNTY, INCORPORATED, Defendant.
Appeal by Plaintiff from Order entered 21 January 2021 by Judge Phyllis M.
Gorham in Pender County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 9 March
2022.
Lt. Col. Donald Sullivan, pro se, for plaintiff-appellant.
Carl W. Thurman, III for defendant-appellee.
HAMPSON, Judge.
¶1 Lt. Col. Donald Sullivan (Plaintiff) appeals from the trial court’s 21 January
2021 Order which granted a Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default entered against
Pender County, Incorporated (Defendant). Because an order setting aside an entry
of default is an interlocutory order and we conclude Plaintiff has not identified any
substantial right that would be lost absent an immediate appeal which might
otherwise give rise to a right to appeal the trial court’s interlocutory order, we dismiss
Plaintiff’s appeal. The Record tends to reflect the following:
SULLIVAN V. PENDER COUNTY
2022-NCCOA-458
Opinion of the Court
Factual and Procedural Background
¶2 On 28 August 2020, Plaintiff filed a Complaint seeking reimbursement of taxes
Plaintiff claimed are illegally collected by Defendant and injunctive relief restraining
Defendant from the assessment and collection of property taxes. On 7 October 2020,
Defendant filed an Answer to the Complaint. On 12 October 2020, Plaintiff filed a
Motion captioned Motion for Default Judgment. On 13 October 2020, an Assistant
Clerk of Superior Court for Pender County entered an Order allowing Plaintiff’s
Motion pursuant to Rule 55(a) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure, which
governs entry of default. On 8 December 2020, Defendant filed a Motion to Set Aside
Default and in the Alternative Motion to Enlarge Time which sought to deem the 7
October 2020 Answer timely filed. Following a 19 January 2021 hearing, the trial
court entered its Order Granting Defendant’s Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default.
The trial court determined good cause had been shown to set aside entry of default in
that the clerk did not have authority to enter default after the Answer had been filed
and that Defendant had made a mistake as to when the Answer was due. The trial
court also ruled Plaintiff would not be prejudiced by setting aside entry of default.
On 16 February 2021, Plaintiff filed written Notice of Appeal to this Court from the
trial court’s Order Granting Defendant’s Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default.
Appellate Jurisdiction
¶3 Before we can reach the merits of this appeal, we must first examine whether
SULLIVAN V. PENDER COUNTY
2022-NCCOA-458
Opinion of the Court
this appeal is properly before this Court such that we have authority to reach the
merits. This is so because: “Appeals from the trial division in civil cases are permitted
only by statute.” Ford v. Mann, 201 N.C. App. 714, 716, 690 S.E.2d 281, 283 (2010).
¶4 As a general matter, with certain exceptions not applicable here: “appeal lies
of right directly to the Court of Appeals . . . from any final judgment of a superior
court.” N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7A-27(b)(1) (2021). “A final judgment is one which disposes
of the cause as to all the parties, leaving nothing to be judicially determined between
them in the trial court.” Veazey v. Durham, 231 N.C. 357, 361-62, 57 S.E.2d 377, 381
(1950). Whereas, “an interlocutory order is one made during the pendency of an
action, which does not dispose of the case, but leaves it for further action by the trial
court in order to settle and determine the entire controversy.” Id.
¶5 Generally, there is no right to appeal from an interlocutory order. Jeffreys v.
Raleigh Oaks Joint Venture, 115 N.C. App. 377, 379, 444 S.E.2d 252, 253 (1994).
However, a party may appeal an interlocutory order “where delaying the appeal will
irreparably impair a substantial right of the party.” Hudson-Cole Dev. Corp. v.
Beemer, 132 N.C. App. 341, 344, 511 S.E.2d 309, 311 (1999) (citation omitted); see
N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 1A-1, Rule 54(b), 1-277, 7A-27(d) (2021). “It is the appellant’s
burden to present appropriate grounds for . . . acceptance of an interlocutory appeal
. . .” Hanesbrands Inc. v. Fowler, 369 N.C. 216, 218, 794 S.E.2d 497, 499 (2016).
¶6 Here, Plaintiff seeks an immediate appeal of an Order Granting Defendant’s
SULLIVAN V. PENDER COUNTY
2022-NCCOA-458
Opinion of the Court
Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default. An order setting aside an entry of default
previously entered pursuant to Rule 55(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure is
interlocutory. Pioneer Acoustical Co. v. Cisne & Assocs., Inc., 25 N.C. App. 114, 114,
212 S.E.2d 402, 403 (1975).1 Thus, as a general principle, Plaintiff has no right to an
immediate appeal of this interlocutory order.
¶7 Plaintiff acknowledges the interlocutory nature of the Order Granting
Defendant’s Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default. Nevertheless, Plaintiff asserts the
Order affects a substantial right justifying his immediate appeal in this case.
Plaintiff contends the Order setting aside the entry of default had the effect of
overruling a final judgment. Plaintiff, however, confuses the entry of default under
Rule 55(a) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure—what is at issue here—
and a final default judgment under Rule 55(b) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil
Procedure. “The entry of default, which is the first step, is interlocutory in nature
and is not a final judicial action.” State Emps.’ Credit Union, Inc. v. Gentry, 75 N.C.
App. 260, 265, 330 S.E.2d 645, 648 (1985) (citation omitted). Thus, Plaintiff’s
contention here is unavailing.
1 A panel of this Court has previously observed: “In fact, an order setting aside an
entry of default is the virtual poster child for interlocutory orders given that many additional
steps will have to occur before Plaintiffs’ claims are resolved at the Superior Court level.”
Decker v. Homes, Inc./Constr. Mgmt. & Fin. Grp., 197 N.C. App. 628, 680 S.E.2d 270 (2009)
(unpublished).
SULLIVAN V. PENDER COUNTY
2022-NCCOA-458
Opinion of the Court
¶8 Plaintiff further contends the Order setting aside the entry of default impacted
his rights as an adverse ruling over the trial court’s jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s person
and property. This contention is without merit as, again, the trial court’s decision is
interlocutory and not a final judgment on the merits. Moreover, in setting aside the
entry of default, the trial court will continue to exercise jurisdiction over this matter
pending a final determination on the merits of Plaintiff’s case. We, therefore, reject
Plaintiff’s contention in this regard.
¶9 Finally, Plaintiff has failed to show any merit in this interlocutory appeal.
Plaintiff obtained entry of default after the filing of Defendant’s albeit untimely
Answer. However:
default may not be entered if an answer has been filed, even if the
answer is deficient in some respect. Peebles v. Moore, 302 N.C.
351, 275 S.E.2d 833 (1981) (no default judgment could be entered
by clerk even though answer not timely filed); Rich v. Norfolk
Southern Railway Co., 244 N.C. 175, 92 S.E.2d 768 (1956)
(unverified answer precluded entry of default judgment); Bailey
v. Davis, 231 N.C. 86, 55 S.E.2d 919 (1949) (no default judgment
could be entered by clerk even though answer not timely filed).
N. Carolina Nat. Bank v. Virginia Carolina Builders, 307 N.C. 563, 568, 299 S.E.2d
629, 632 (1983).
¶ 10 Thus, Plaintiff’s appeal in this case is interlocutory and does not affect a
substantial right. Therefore, we are without jurisdiction to review this matter on
immediate appeal. Consequently, we must dismiss Plaintiff’s appeal.
SULLIVAN V. PENDER COUNTY
2022-NCCOA-458
Opinion of the Court
Conclusion
¶ 11 Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Judges DILLON and WOOD concur.