Case: 21-1131 Document: 127 Page: 1 Filed: 07/11/2022
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
July 11, 2022
ERRATA
______________________
Appeal Nos. 2021-1131, 2021-1132, 2021-1133, 2021-1134,
2021-1135, 2021-1136, 2021-1137, 2021-1138, 2021-1139,
2021-1140, 2021-1142, 2021-1143, 2021-1144, 2021-1145,
2021-1146, 2021-1147, 2021-1148, 2021-1151, 2021-1152,
2021-1155, 2021-1157, 2021-1159, 2021-1161, 2021-1162,
2021-1163, 2021-1164, 2021-1165, 2021-1167, 2021-1171,
2021-1172, 2021-1173, 2021-1174, 2021-1175, 2021-1176,
2021-1177, 2021-1178, 2021-1184, 2021-1186, 2021-1187,
2021-1188, 2021-1189, 2021-1190, 2021-1192, 2021-1193,
2021-1195, 2021-1196, 2021-1197, 2021-1198, 2021-1199,
2021-1200, 2021-1201, 2021-1204, 2021-1205, 2021-1206,
2021-1207, 2021-1208, 2021-1214, 2021-1215, 2021-1216,
2021-1217, 2021-1218, 2021-1220, 2021-1221, 2021-1222,
2021-1223, 2021-1224, 2021-1225, 2021-1230, 2021-1231,
2021-1232, 2021-1233, 2021-1234, 2021-1237, 2021-1238,
2021-1239, 2021-1240, 2021-1241, 2021-1242, 2021-1243,
2021-1244, 2021-1250, 2021-1251, 2021-1252, 2021-1253,
2021-1254, 2021-1255, 2021-1256, 2021-1268, 2021-1269,
2021-1270, 2021-1271, 2021-1272, 2021-1273, 2021-1274,
2021-1275, 2021-1276, 2021-1277, 2021-1279, 2021-1280,
2021-1281, 2021-1282, 2021-1283, 2021-1284, 2021-1285,
2021-1286, 2021-1287, 2021-1288, 2021-1289, 2021-1290,
2021-1291, 2021-1293, 2021-1294, 2021-1295, 2021-1296,
2021-1302, 2021-1303, 2021-1304, 2021-1305, 2021-1306,
2021-1307, 2021-1308, 2021-1309, 2021-1310, 2021-1311,
2021-1312, 2021-1313, 2021-1314, 2021-1315, 2021-1316,
2021-1317, 2021-1318, 2021-1319, 2021-1320, 2021-1322,
Case: 21-1131 Document: 127 Page: 2 Filed: 07/11/2022
2 MILTON v. US
2021-1324, 2021-1325, 2021-1335, 2021-1336, 2021-1337,
2021-1338, 2021-1339, 2021-1341, 2021-1394, 2021-1398,
2021-1403, 2021-1404, 2021-1405, 2021-1406, 2021-1407,
2021-1427, 2021-1429, 2021-1431, 2021-1444, 2021-1455,
2021-1464, 2021-1465, 2021-1467, 2021-1468, 2021-1472,
2021-1479, 2021-1481, 2021-1482, 2021-1483, 2021-1492,
2021-1494, 2021-1499, 2021-1513, 2021-1529, 2021-1539,
2021-1540, 2021-1541, 2021-1847, 2021-1889, 2021-1890,
2021-1891, 2021-1894, 2021-1947, 2021-2047
______________________
VIRGINIA MILTON AND ARNOLD MILTON, ON
BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHER
SIMILARLY SITUATED PERSONS, ET AL.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants
TRAVELERS EXCESS AND SURPLUS LINES
COMPANY,
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
UNITED STATES,
Defendant-Appellee
______________________
Decided: June 2, 2022
Precedential Opinion
______________________
Please make the following change to page 14 of the panel
opinion:
In other words, we leave it for the lower court to
consider: (1) whether Appellants have shown that
a temporary taking occurred under the test appli-
cable to flooding cases, Ark. Game & Fish Comm’n
v. United States, 568 U.S. 23, 39 (2012); (2) whether
Case: 21-1131 Document: 127 Page: 3 Filed: 07/11/2022
MILTON v. US 3
Appellants have established causation when con-
sidering “the impact of the entirety of government
actions that address the relevant risk,” St. Bernard
Par. Gov’t v. United States, 887 F.3d 1354, 1364
(Fed. Cir. 2018), cert. denied 139 S. Ct. 796 (2019);
and (3) whether the Government can invoke the ne-
cessity doctrine as a defense.
is changed to:
In other words, we leave it for the lower court to
consider: (1) whether Appellants have shown that
a temporary taking occurred under the test appli-
cable to flooding cases, Ark. Game & Fish Comm’n
v. United States, 568 U.S. 23, 39 (2012); (2) whether
Appellants have shown that a permanent taking
occurred; (3) whether Appellants have established
causation when considering “the impact of the en-
tirety of government actions that address the rele-
vant risk,” St. Bernard Par. Gov’t v. United States,
887 F.3d 1354, 1364 (Fed. Cir. 2018), cert. denied
139 S. Ct. 796 (2019); and (4) whether the Govern-
ment can invoke the necessity doctrine as a de-
fense.