DENY AND DISMISS and Opinion Filed July 8, 2022
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-22-00610-CV
DELORIS PHILLIPS, Appellant
V.
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE DIVISION OF WORKERS’
COMPENSATION, FLEMING FOODS, INC., CORE-MARK HOLDING
CO., THE RAYMOND CORP., CIGNA INSURANCE CO., BANKERS
STANDARD INSURANCE CO., ESIS-CHUBB MANAGEMENT CORP.,
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., UNITED PARCEL SERVICE,
INC., TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION 767, CITY OF DALLAS
MUNICIPALITY, DALLAS COUNTY MUNICIPALITY, AND
DALLAS POLICE DEPARTMENT, Appellees
On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-06299
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Goldstein, and Justice Smith
Opinion by Chief Justice Burns
Before the Court is appellant’s petition for permissive appeal. The petition
fails to meet each requirement set forth in Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure
28.3(a), (e). Accordingly, we deny the petition and dismiss the appeal for want of
jurisdiction. See id.; 42.3(a); Draper v. Guernsey, No. 03-15-00741-CV, 2016 WL
462763, at *2 (Tex. App.—Austin Feb. 3, 2016, pet. denied) (mem. op.) (dismissing
appeal for want of jurisdiction because appellant failed to obtain trial court order
granting permission to pursue permissive appeal of interlocutory order).
/Robert D. Burns, III/
ROBERT D. BURNS, III
CHIEF JUSTICE
220610F.P05
–2–
S
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
DELORIS PHILLIPS, Appellant On Appeal from the 101st Judicial
District Court, Dallas County, Texas
No. 05-22-00610-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-06299.
Opinion delivered by Chief Justice
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF Burns. Justices Goldstein and Smith
INSURANCE DIVISION OF participating.
WORKERS’
COMPENSATION, FLEMING
FOODS, INC., CORE-MARK
HOLDING CO., THE RAYMOND
CORP., CIGNA INSURANCE CO.,
BANKERS STANDARD
INSURANCE CO., ESIS-CHUBB
MANAGEMENT CORP., LIBERTY
MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.,
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.,
TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION 767,
CITY OF DALLAS
MUNICIPALITY, DALLAS
COUNTY MUNICIPALITY, AND
DALLAS POLICE DEPARTMENT,
Appellees
–3–
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY the petition for
permissive appeal and DISMISS the appeal.
Judgment entered this 7th day of July 2022.
–4–