Bellah v. Hilles

The Court

held that as foreign attachment was only to compel appearance and that as the defendant had appeared by putting in special bail, under the express terms of the statute, the case proceeded as in cases commenced by summons, and that the plaintiff *35was therefore entitled to amend.

Waples and wife vs. McIlvaine’s Admr., 5 Harr., 381; McColley vs. Collins, 5 Harr., 391; Benjamin’s Executors vs. Boyce, 3 Harr., 315; Collins vs. Townsend, 2 Harr., 317.

Amendment allowed.