Griswold v. Bigelow

Peters, J.

concurred in the opinion, that the deed was void, and, on that ground, would not grant a new trial. On the other point he had some doubts; and as it was not necessary to decide it, in order to dispose of the case, he declined the expression of any opinion upon it.

Lanmak, J. being related to one of the parties, and Daggett, J. having been of counsel in the cause, gave no opinion.

New trial not to be granted.