United States v. Robinson

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Court of Appeals United States FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED April 30, 2009 No. 08-10078 Charles R. Fulbruge III Conference Calendar Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. GERROD TRAVOR ROBINSON Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 7:07-CR-7-ALL Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Gerrod Travor Robinson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Although Robinson was granted an extension of time in which to file a response, he has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of counsel’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; such a claim generally * Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. No. 08-10078 “cannot be resolved on direct appeal when the claim has not been raised before the district court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations.” United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. 2