(dissenting). The finding supports the conclusion. I dissent on the ground that the case is controlled by the rule enunciated in the following cases: Duncan v. Milford Savings Bank, 134 Conn. 395, 402, 58 A. 2d 260; Palverari v. Finta, 129 Conn. 38, 43, 26 A. 2d 229; Hoey v. Investors’ Mortgage & Guaranty Co., 118 Conn. 226, 231, 171 A. 438; Jarvis v. Martin, 77 Conn. 19, 21, 58 A. 15.