14 F.3d 593
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
David BRIGHT, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Sewall SMITH; Theodore Purnell; Lloyd Hopkins; Donald
Bisser; Robert Boyce; P. Briggs, Defendant Appellees.
No. 93-7115.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 16, 1993.
Decided Jan. 18, 1994.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Edward S. Northrop, Senior District Judge. (CA-93-2849-N)
David Bright, appellant pro se.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint and the attached "Motion to Re-Open or Motion to Refile Civil Right [sic] Complaint." Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bright v. Smith, No. CA-93-2849-N (D. Md. Oct. 13, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.