DISSENTING OPINION.
JOHNSON, J.I dissent, and as I view the facts of this case I conclude the foregoing decision is in conflict with the true intent and purpose of the statutes relating to lost property and with the principles of law enunciated by the Supreme Court in Hoagland v. Amusement Company, 170 Mo. 335, and State v. McCann, 19 Mo. 249. Accordingly I certify the cause to the Supreme Court.