John E. Anderson, Richard S. Baker, Willie Barnes, Lawrence Howell Barr, Harry R. Beech, Terrance Bigley, Donald Crabtree, Donald E. Gallagher, Robert W. Harry, Robert Heygster, Jerry L. Hudson, Sr., Roscoe M. Hutzell, Dennis R. Jacobs, Rolland Johnson, George William King, Jr., Lawrence F. Luckel, Neil E. McGarry David M. Matvay, James Irving Purnell, Michael J. Reilly, James H. Salter, Anthony E. Santilli, Haig Scott, John W. Smith, Joseph Lawrence Sullivan, Percy G. Sussex, Guy E. Tavel, Herbert C. Wheelock, Jr., Ramon I. Ayalo, Mark Bartels, Joseph A. Bongiorno, Mark J. Gleason, Doug Leo Vincent Goodwin, Walter Hansborough, Jr., Eugene M. Hickey, John Hines, Milt A. Herzing, Carolyn D. Jackson v. United States

16 F.3d 421
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.

John E. ANDERSON, Richard S. Baker, Willie Barnes, Lawrence
Howell Barr, Harry R. Beech, Terrance Bigley, Donald
Crabtree, Donald E. Gallagher, Robert W. Harry, Robert
Heygster, Jerry L. Hudson, Sr., Roscoe M. Hutzell, Dennis R.
Jacobs, Rolland Johnson, George William King, Jr., Lawrence
F. Luckel, Neil E. McGarry, David M. Matvay, James Irving
Purnell, Michael J. Reilly, James H. Salter, Anthony E.
Santilli, Haig Scott, John W. Smith, Joseph Lawrence
Sullivan, Percy G. Sussex, Guy E. Tavel, Herbert C.
Wheelock, Jr., Ramon I. Ayalo, Mark Bartels, Joseph A.
Bongiorno, Mark J. Gleason, Doug Leo Vincent Goodwin, Walter
Hansborough, Jr., Eugene M. Hickey, John Hines, Milt A.
Herzing, Carolyn D. Jackson, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 92-5168.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Dec. 14, 1993.

1

DISMISSED.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is

2

ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed.R.App.P. 42(b).