Opinion by
Dallinger, J.In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United States v. Samuel (26 C. C. P. A. 22, T. D. 49574) the spiegeleisen in question was held dutiable at 75-cents per ton under paragraph 301 as claimed.
Opinion by
Dallinger, J.In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United States v. Samuel (26 C. C. P. A. 22, T. D. 49574) the spiegeleisen in question was held dutiable at 75-cents per ton under paragraph 301 as claimed.