The circuit judge, we think, was correct in holding that the letter of the plaintiffs of September 20, was not an unconditional acceptance of the defendant’s offer, and consequently no contract was effected.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
The circuit judge, we think, was correct in holding that the letter of the plaintiffs of September 20, was not an unconditional acceptance of the defendant’s offer, and consequently no contract was effected.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.