dissenting. It is evident from an inspection of the record that this case was tried upon the theory that as the defendants had the undoubted right and authority to put any person off their coach who refused to pay his fare, therefore, so long as they permitted such person to remain thereon, he was by their consent a passenger to all intents and purposes, and entitled to the same degree of care as any other passenger, and I am not yet convinced that this theory is incorrect,