Curl v. Muller

POkLEY, J.

I concur in the affirmance of the judgment appealed from. In my opinion, the answer does not state a defense to plaintiff’s cause of action, and judgment ought to have been entered on the pleadings.

Note. — Reported in 200 N. W. 106. See, Headnote (1), American Key-Numbered Digest, Fraudulent conveyances, Key-No. 174(1), 27 C. J. Sec. 426 (1925 Anno.), Agency, 2 C. J. Sec. 411; (2) Judgment, Key-No. 693, 23 Cyc. 1263; (3) Principal and agent; Key-No. 78(1), 2 C. J. Sec. 401; (4) Principal and agent, Key-No. 154(1),. 2 C. J. Sec. 402. '